Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42555562›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Exploring the contagion routes of digital emotion on health topics: A multidimensional configuration analysis pre-post rumor refutation.

Huawei Zhi, Yan Qiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huawei ZhiSchool of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0551-8338
Yan QiaoSchool of Economics and Management, Tiangong University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9748-1108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health topics are consistently prevalent on social media and are highly susceptible to rumor. The effectiveness of rumor refutation in fostering positive shifts in public opinion remains to be empirically validated. On social media platforms, digital emotion contagion significantly influences netizens' attitudes toward health topics and the reception of information aimed at rumor refutation. The Weibo platform is employed to gather extensive user interaction data, and authoritative rumor refutation information is selected as key nodes. Based on digital emotion contagion theory and tipping point theory, this study examines the multidimensional factors influencing digital emotion contagion in the dissemination of health topics. Sentiment analysis (SA) and social network analysis (SNA) are employed to assign values to variables. This study performs a multidimensional configuration analysis of the digital emotional contagion process pre- and post-refutation. Prior to refutation, topic type triggers positive digital emotions among rational netizens, whereas opinion leaders are more likely to elicit such emotions among conformist netizens. When opinion leaders are present and network density is high, negative digital emotions are more likely to propagate. The effectiveness of official institutions in rumor refutation is determined by various factors, including topic type, the role of opinion leaders, the emotional tone of the content, and network density. These factors collectively help suppress the dissemination of negative digital emotions. Research suggests that official refutations of rumors do not always lead to an improvement in digital emotional states; rather, the more prevalent a health topic becomes, the more pronounced the effect of refutation. When the topic is widely disseminated and the audience's values are aligned, refutation can positively influence digital emotions. An expandable analytical framework is offered, establishing a new foundation for investigating how to promptly correct rumors and effectively guide digital emotions during the dissemination of health topics.

Indexed as

EmotionsInformation DisseminationSocial MediaDigital MediaHumansPublic Opinion

Identifiers

PMID42555562
PMCPMC13440863

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.