ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Public healthcare system preparedness and community perceptions on comprehensive preconception care service delivery in Maharashtra, India.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Preconception care (PCC) comprises a set of biomedical, behavioural, and social interventions provided before conception to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. PCC remains a critical missing link in the continuum of reproductive healthcare in India. This study assessed public health-system preparedness and community perception related to PCC service delivery in Maharashtra. Methods A mixed-method, pre-intervention situational analysis was conducted to assess public health-system preparedness and community perceptions regarding PCC service delivery in selected districts of Maharashtra, India. Using stratified purposive sampling, 31 public health facilities were assessed using a facility checklist adapted from World Health Organization (WHO) SARA (Service Availability and Readiness Assessment) domains and mapped to WHO health system building blocks. Additionally, 143 key informant interviews (KIIs) were conducted among healthcare providers, and 20 focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with newly married couples and mothers-in-law across rural (tribal and non-tribal) and urban (slum and non-slum) settings. Qualitative findings were thematically analysed using the social ecological model. Both models were triangulated using a COM-B (capacity, opportunity, motivation→ behaviour) framework. Results All assessed facilities had basic infrastructure and manpower; however, PCC services were largely restricted to anaemia prophylaxis and family planning commodities. Major systemic challenges included the absence of PCC-specific guidelines, irregular supply of essential medicines and diagnostics, limited health management and information systems (HMIS) integration, weak policy coordination, inadequate human resources, and referral pathways. From the community perspective, PCC awareness was negligible; misconceptions linked it to infertility care, and family gatekeeping limited women's autonomy. Gender norms and poor male involvement further constrained service uptake. Interpretation and conclusions Although Maharashtra has favourable policy support for PCC through the Mission Vatsalya initiative, significant gaps persist in the health system's readiness and community awareness. Developing PCC-specific operational and technical guidelines, capacity building, provision of information, and education material, PCC indicator integration in HMIS, and demand generation, coupled with male involvement, can optimise PCC uptake and improve PCC service utilisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.