ArticleChemistry & biodiversity2026
Toxicological and Cytogenetic Screening of Strontium Ranelate Alone and in Combination With Resveratrol.
Article in Chemistry & biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the cytogenotoxicity of strontium ranelate (SrR), an important therapeutic agent used in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, alone, as well as in combined treatment with resveratrol (RSV), a natural polyphenolic compound with protective properties, in standardized genetic toxicology assays. The concentrations selected for the tests included vehicle control; 10 µM SrR; 200 µM SrR; 1000 µM SrR; 10 µM RSV; 25 µM RSV; 80 µM RSV; and 200 µM SrR + 80 µM RSV, with RSV-containing treatments prepared using 2% DMSO as vehicle. Preliminary toxicological and cytogenotoxic screening was conducted using the Artemia salina and Allium cepa bioassays, both performed in quintuplicate. Active A. salina nauplii were transferred to test tubes containing the selected concentrations and treated for 24 h. For the A. cepa assay, forty bulbs were randomly divided into eight groups and exposed to the previously described treatments. Treatments with SrR applied alone induced toxic effects in A. salina and exhibited clastogenic and aneugenic effects in A. cepa. In contrast, RSV and the combined treatment were not cytotoxic and were still able to reduce the DNA damage induced by SrR, thus demonstrating antigenotoxic potential over SrR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.