Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557281›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Closing the sepsis gap: from molecular mechanisms to scalable bedside care.

Luis Felipe Reyes, Krzysztof Laudanski

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luis Felipe ReyesUnisabana Center for Translational Science, Universidad de La Sabana, Chía, Colombia. luis.reyes5@unisabana.edu.co.
Krzysztof LaudanskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent estimates point to roughly 49 million cases and 11-13 million deaths annually due to sepsis, with a disproportionate burden borne by low- and middle-income countries. Three decades of progress, summarised in the recently updated Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, have refined how clinicians screen for, resuscitate, and treat patients with sepsis. Yet, persistent uncertainty surrounds early identification, pathogen detection, hemodynamic targets, adjunctive therapies, and the long-term burden carried by survivors. This Collection, Sepsis: Treatment, intervention, mortality, brings together original research that maps where the field is moving: pragmatic diagnostics that run on standard hospital equipment; multi-omic biomarker discovery in blood, plasma extracellular vesicles, and urine; computational dissection of pathogen biology and longitudinal host-response trajectories; preclinical interrogation of metabolic and signalling pathways implicated in organ injury; and mechanistic studies of the muscle and mitochondrial wasting that shape life after sepsis. Together, these papers sketch a research agenda for sepsis that is simultaneously molecularly precise and operationally scalable.

Indexed as

SepsisBiomarkersHumansMultiomicsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID42557281
PMCPMC13444060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.