Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557412›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2026

Identifying marker-trait associations for wheat stem sawfly resistance.

Mik Hammers, Zachary J Winn, Brian Rice, Punya Nachappa, Katherine Frels, Geoff Morris, Richard Esten Mason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mik HammersDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA. mikhammers@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2661-8389
Zachary J WinnDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1543-1527
Brian RiceDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2482-3592
Punya NachappaDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9673-9939
Katherine FrelsDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3032-5570
Geoff MorrisDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3067-3359
Richard Esten MasonDepartment of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5576-9015

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-68013-36439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageTwo novel WSS resistance loci were identified on chromosomes 2B and 5A. Characterization of WSS resistance loci will improve breeders' ability to select to reduce yield loss due to WSS. Wheat stem sawfly (WSS) is a native grass feeding pest of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L) which is difficult to control since most of its life cycle occurs within the stem of wheat plants. The only well-characterized genetic resistance to WSS is the solid stem locus (Sst1) on chromosome 3B, which exhibits environmental variability. It is critical to identify novel forms of genetic resistance outside of Sst1 to improve the overall resistance of wheat to WSS. In this study, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed on lines in the Colorado State University wheat breeding program grown between 2014 and 2025 field seasons for three traits of interest: heading date (HD), WSS damage in the form of stem cutting (CUT), and stem solidity (SOLID). Significant marker trait associations (MTA) were identified on chromosomes 2B, 2D, 3A, 3B, 5A, and 5D for CUT and 2A, 3B, 4B, and 6A for SOLID. Significant MTA from these GWAS were used to identify beneficial allelic combinations (AC) for WSS resistance. The stem cutting ACs which had the lowest damage estimates were those in which lines possessed the resistant haplotype at every locus assessed (CUT = 2.35, error = 0.21, N = 56). Lines that had all resistant alleles in the stem solidity ACs showed the same superior estimate (SOLID = 14.7, error = 0.78, N = 22). The positive effects of the identified small-effect MTA on CUT and SOLID indicated the importance of including these loci when breeding for WSS resistance.

Indexed as

Disease ResistancePlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociTriticumAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGenetic Association StudiesGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyPhenotypePlant StemsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID42557412
PMCPMC13442502

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.