ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
An Experimental and Computational Investigation to Establish the Mechanical Behaviour of Paediatric Aortic Coarctation Tissue.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe tissue mechanics resulting in coarctation of the aorta (CoA) remain poorly understood, limiting treatment options, particularly in paediatric patients. Endovascular stenting is the standard of care in adolescents and adults; however current devices are largely used off-label and do not account for the biomechanics or microstructure of the coarcted tissue. This study addresses this knowledge gap by combining uniaxial ring testing, histological assessment and finite element modelling of paediatric aortic coarctation samples to quantify its mechanical behaviour and layer-specific material parameters.
methodsAortic coarctation samples were obtained from paediatric patients and analysed using uniaxial ring testing and histology to characterise the tissue's mechanical response and the influence of microstructure. Finite element models were then developed to represent the ductal and aortic layers, and uniaxial ring tests were simulated with material parameters fitted to the experimental data.
resultsUniaxial ring testing of paediatric aortic coarctation samples revealed marked variability in mechanical behaviour. Histological analysis identified two distinct tissue components-ductal and vessel tissue-with qualitative microstructural differences in collagen and elastin, as well as cellular density and morphology. For the first time, material parameters for the individual tissue components were quantified, with first-order Ogden models shown to best capture the experimental and computational behaviour.
conclusionUniaxial ring testing and histological analysis were used to assess paediatric aortic coarctation samples and to establish fitted material parameters to the experimental data. Quantifying both the combined mechanical response provides preliminary biomechanical data that may be useful for future computational modelling studies investigating aortic coarctation tissue behaviour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42557470What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.