Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42557792›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of audiology2026

Valence ratings of recorded media for adults with and without hearing loss.

Haiping Huang, Anne-Charlotte J Belloeil, Todd A Ricketts, Javier Santos, Rebecca Krivoshey, Gabrielle B Padgett, Erin M Picou

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haiping HuangDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1564-8331
Anne-Charlotte J BelloeilDepartment of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Todd A RickettsDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Javier SantosDepartamento de Otorrinolaringología, Universidad de Navarra, Navarra, Spain.
Rebecca KrivosheyDepartment of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gabrielle B PadgettDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Erin M PicouDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Funding

Developing Research Careers in the Hearing Sciences IIT35DC008763 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LINDA J. HOOD · 2007 to 2026
$533k
NIDCD NIH HHS T35 DC008763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study evaluated valence ratings in response to recorded media under a variety of listening situations. DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE: Younger adults with normal hearing (

resultsIn both experiments, older listeners with hearing loss provided significantly lower valence ratings than their typical hearing peers, but only when the surround sound loudspeakers were used or when the dialogue-to-background ratio was +7 dB. Older listeners provided lower valence ratings when the loudspeaker was either stereo or surround sound or when dialogue-to-background ratio was +12 dB, but only when visual cues were not available.

conclusionOlder adults with hearing loss exhibit disrupted ratings of valence to recorded media. The effect could be mitigated with improved dialogue-to-background ratios of television shows and movies, but not with surround sound systems.

Indexed as

background noiseemotionHearing losstelevisionvalence

Identifiers

PMID42557792
PMCPMC13615645

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.