ArticleGlobal health action2026
Strategic development of integrated governance for type 2 diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) care in Indonesia: a mixed-methods approach.
Article in Global health action, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) management requires integrated and continuous care; however, service fragmentation remains prevalent in universal health coverage (UHC) systems.
objectivesThis study examines how governance arrangements influence service integration and patient-reported experiences in T2DM care in Indonesia, to develop strategic recommendations for strengthening integrated governance.
methodsA concurrent mixed-methods design, qualitative driven, was employed. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews with policymakers, insurance representatives, hospital managers, clinicians, and primary care providers Quantitative data were collected from 107 adults with T2DM using structured questionnaires assessing knowledge, medication adherence, perceived service quality, and health-related quality of life. Findings were integrated using a joint display guided by Green's PRECEDE framework; strategic positioning was assessed through a SWOT and Internal-External matrix, and a TOWS matrix was developed to formulate recommendations.
resultsQualitative findings identified four governance barriers: fragmented primary-referral care pathways, misaligned financing arrangements, uneven facility and workforce capacity, and weak coordination and monitoring mechanisms. Quantitative findings indicated high patient knowledge (median 86.7%) and medication adherence (76.6% highly adherent), yet generally positive service quality perceptions, though reliability showed the largest gap. Physical quality of life remained suboptimal, particularly in energy and general health. Strategic positioning placed current T2DM governance in the grow-and-build quadrant, indicating capacity for proactive reform.
conclusionThe development of an integrated governance strategy emphasizing structured referral pathways, aligned financing with chronic care needs, institutionalized diabetes educator roles, and accelerated health information system interoperability - offering actionable lessons for universal health coverage systems in low-and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.