Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42558193›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

How can we change behavior to bolster biosecurity? A scoping review and recommendations.

Julia M Smith, Jake Fountain, Jennifer Manyweathers, Jenny-Ann Toribio, Suman Das Gupta, Victoria J Brookes, Marta Hernandez-Jover

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia M SmithDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Jake FountainSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer ManyweathersSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Jenny-Ann ToribioSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Suman Das GuptaSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Victoria J BrookesSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Marta Hernandez-JoverSchool of Agricultural, Environmental and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers' perceptions and the associated facilitators and barriers relevant to performing biosecurity and animal health measures have been well studied. Few studies, however, have evaluated interventions aiming at promoting the adoption of biosecurity measures. This scoping review was conducted to identify and evaluate such studies. Interventions were mapped to potentially useful frameworks, with the aim of informing the implementation of future biosecurity interventions. Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, structured literature searches supplemented by reference list screening were conducted. Studies were included if their objective was to evaluate interventions aimed at increasing biosecurity at the farm level to protect livestock from infectious disease challenges. Screening, data extraction, mapping, and conflict resolution were conducted by the first author and at least one co-author. Extracted data on intervention design included context, target participants, desired outcomes, program components, evaluation methods, and theoretical frameworks. Interventions were mapped to behavior change wheel categories, including policies, interventions, and sources of behavior according to the COM-B framework. Of 699 records retrieved, 445 were unique. Of these, 263 underwent full-text screening, and 33 met the inclusion criteria and represented 41 distinct studies conducted or published between 2008 and 2024. Eighteen studies were conducted in the United States or the United Kingdom (12 and 6, respectively), and 25 did not reference a specific disease. Major agricultural species (poultry, swine, cattle, and sheep) were represented, with most studies conducted in commercial production systems (

Indexed as

behavior changebiosecurityinterventionslivestock diseasescoping review

Identifiers

PMID42558193
PMCPMC13437398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.