ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Tumor fat composition predicts response to everolimus and supports low-dose therapy in TSC-associated renal angiomyolipomas: a multicenter prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Renal angiomyolipomas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC-RAML) may lead to progressive renal damage and hemorrhage. Everolimus is recommended as first-line therapy, but predictors of treatment response and optimal dosing strategies remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of everolimus and to determine whether tumor fat composition predicts treatment response, as well as whether a reduced-dose regimen provides comparable outcomes. Methods: In this multicenter prospective cohort study conducted across multiple centers in China, 183 consecutive patients with TSC-RAML were enrolled. Three prespecified, outcome-specific analytical subsets were generated from the overall cohort according to the data required for each analysis: (1) standard-dose everolimus efficacy analysis, (2) CT-based tumor fat-composition analysis, and (3) exploratory dose-comparison analysis. Radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the RAML response rate, defined as ≥50% reduction in target tumor volume. Key findings and limitations: A ≥50% reduction in tumor volume occurred in 44% (34/78) of patients at 3 months and 83% (60/72) at 6 months. Tumor reduction was significantly greater in fat-poor than in fat-rich lesions. No significant difference in response was observed between the standard- and low-dose groups. Oral mucositis was the most common adverse event but occurred less frequently in the low-dose group (P = .002). Tumor regrowth was observed after treatment discontinuation. Limitations include the nonrandomized design, in which dose selection was based on clinical criteria from previously published protocols, unequal group sizes in the dose-comparison analysis, and the open-label nature of treatment administration, which may introduce selection and ascertainment bias. Conclusions and clinical implications: In this large Chinese cohort of patients with TSC-RAML, everolimus effectively reduces tumor volume, particularly in fat-poor lesions. CT-derived tumor fat composition may help predict treatment response. In this exploratory cohort, low-dose everolimus showed promising short-term activity with potentially improved tolerability, but randomized studies are needed to confirm comparative efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.