ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Factors associated with adverse pregnancy outcome and psychological outcomes during re-pregnancy: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) leads to both huge psychological trauma and adverse pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the status of perceived uncertainty during re-pregnancy in patients with RSA and identify the associated factors of uncertainty. Methods: This cross-sectional study used a convenience sampling method to select pregnant women in the process of re-pregnancy with recurrent spontaneous abortion as subjects. Patients were recruited from a tertiary A-level hospital from June to November 2025. Data were collected using a self-designed general demographic questionnaire, the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale-12, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, the Simple Coping Style Questionnaire, and the Perceived Social Support from Family scale. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were employed to investigate factors associated with perceived uncertainty during re-pregnancy. Results: A total of 230 questionnaires were distributed, and 218 valid questionnaires were collected, with a recovery rate of 94.8%. The mean score of intolerance of uncertainty was (36.02 ± 10.76). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that education level, monthly family income, number of abortions, history of late-term miscarriage, history of assisted reproductive technology, social support from family, generalized anxiety disorder, and copying style were significant independent factors associated with the perception of uncertainty ( Conclusion: The level of perceived uncertainty during re-pregnancy in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion is at a moderate level. Medical staff should pay attention to the early identification of uncertainty in patients, enhance the psychological support for patients, and improve their mental health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.