SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Acute effects of "exercise snacks" on postprandial glucose and insulin responses in populations at metabolic risk: a meta-analysis with exploratory meta-regression and vascular outcomes.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exercise snacks-short, frequent bouts of physical activity that interrupt prolonged sitting-improve postprandial glucose metabolism, yet the moderating role of baseline metabolic status remains unquantified. Methods: Six databases were searched for acute randomized crossover trials comparing exercise snacks with uninterrupted sitting in sedentary adults with metabolic risk. To preserve physiological purity, insulin data were isolated from C-peptide. Standard errors were hierarchically back-calculated from paired test statistics to avoid external assumptions. Standard random-effects models and exploratory meta-regression were applied. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for crossover trials. Results: Eight trials (159 participants) were included. In the primary analysis limited to studies reporting postprandial glucose incremental area under the curve (iAUC; k = 5), exercise snacks significantly reduced glucose iAUC (MD = -5.69 mmol·h/L, 95% CI -9.38 to -2.00, P = 0.003). Substantial heterogeneity was present (I² = 85%), and the 95% prediction interval ranged from -13.53 to 2.15 mmol·h/L, crossing the null. Postprandial insulin iAUC showed a numerical reduction that did not reach statistical significance (MD = -902.64 pmol·h/L, 95% CI -1889.11 to 83.82, P = 0.073, k = 4) and displayed high heterogeneity (I² = 98%). Exploratory meta-regression did not confirm a significant moderating role of baseline metabolic status (P = 0.176) or exercise intensity (P = 0.057). Vascular outcomes were limited to two flow-mediated dilation studies and one endothelin-1 study, and were therefore treated as exploratory. Conclusions: Exercise snacks acutely reduce postprandial glucose under controlled laboratory conditions, but the evidence base is characterized by high heterogeneity, imprecise prediction intervals, and limited statistical power. The currently available data neither confirm a moderating role of baseline metabolic status nor support firm conclusions for insulin or vascular outcomes. Exercise snacks represent a promising adjunctive strategy for improving short-term postprandial glycemia, but cannot yet be recommended as a specific, evidence-based clinical prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.