ArticleDigital health
A federal learning-driven artificial intelligence framework for fundus image myopia diagnosis.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Myopia has emerged as a critical global public health challenge. This study aims to develop a privacy-preserving federated learning (FL) framework for the triple classification of fundus images (normal, myopia, and pathological myopia), designed to generalize across institutions while addressing data heterogeneity and class imbalance. Methods: We propose a novel FL framework integrating a genetic algorithm-inspired dynamic aggregator (FedProx_GA), a distance-aware attention module (OptiFocus), and a class-frequency dynamic loss. It was trained and evaluated on 1,279 fundus images from three heterogeneous medical centers. Performance was compared against standard FL baselines using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Our framework achieved an AUC of 0.9889, performing close to the performance achievable when all data are centrally stored and processed (the non-federated approach) while significantly outperforming conventional FL methods. It demonstrated robust cross-center generalization, with high sensitivity (0.9346) and specificity (0.9673), effectively managing data heterogeneity and class imbalance without breaching data privacy. Conclusion: This work presents an effective, privacy-preserving FL solution for collaborative ophthalmic artificial intelligence, showing strong potential for multi-institutional clinical deployment. Future work should focus on prospective validation with larger, diverse cohorts. The implementation code is publicly available at: https://github.com/AngelaK-code/FL_Myopia-Diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.