ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2026
Computational Modeling of Pro-inflammatory Cytokine-Enhanced Blood Coagulation.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interplay between inflammation and coagulation is a central driver of thrombotic risk across various diseases. While mathematical models of blood coagulation are well established, there remains a critical gap in quantitative frameworks that capture inflammation-induced hypercoagulability. In this study, we develop a mathematical model that explicitly simulates the interaction between pro-inflammatory cytokines and the coagulation cascade. The model incorporates key mechanisms, including: (a) up-regulation of tissue factor by interleukin-1𝛽, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α; (b) suppression of natural anticoagulants, namely, antithrombin III and tissue factor pathway inhibitor, by interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α; and (c) feedback amplification of pro-inflammatory cytokines by thrombin. By encoding the bidirectional feedback between inflammatory and coagulation pathways, the model captures essential features of inflammation-driven hypercoagulability and enables systematic quantification of how variability in inflammatory extent and duration result in heterogeneous thrombin generation (TG) dynamics. To evaluate its effectiveness, we integrate the model with TG assays and apply it to virtual patient cohorts representing 4 clinically distinct conditions: COVID-19, sickle cell disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hemophilia A. Model simulations predict that disease-specific inflammatory environments induce distinct shifts in TG dynamics. In COVID-19 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, elevated cytokine levels lead to shortened lag times and increased thrombin peak, whereas in sickle cell disease, shortened lag times are accompanied by a reduced thrombin peak. These effects are strongly modulated by both cytokine concentration and duration of exposure. These results demonstrate that the proposed computational model augments conventional TG assays by mechanistically linking inflammatory signaling to disease-specific coagulation responses. Collectively, the proposed computational framework extends conventional TG assays by considering the interplay between inflammation and coagulation, thereby providing a mechanistic exploratory platform for generating testable hypotheses regarding disease-specific thromboinflammatory regulation. This framework lays a foundation to support future clinical prediction or individualized therapeutic decision-making after validation using prospective patient-level longitudinal datasets.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.