ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammation in NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is an inflammatory airway disease characterized by adult-onset asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and hypersensitivity reactions to cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) inhibitors. The disease is driven by dysregulated eicosanoid metabolism and sustained type 2 inflammation affecting both the upper and lower airways, resulting in severe disease and limited response to conventional therapies. In recent years, biologic agents targeting key inflammatory pathways have substantially expanded therapeutic options for patients with N-ERD. In this review, we summarize current evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of action of approved biologic therapies, including omalizumab, anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα agents (mepolizumab, reslizumab, depemokimab, benralizumab), dupilumab and tezepelumab, with a particular focus on their effects on sinonasal disease, asthma control, aspirin tolerance, and patient-reported outcomes. Current evidence suggests that dupilumab provides the most consistent multi-domain clinical benefit, particularly in patients with refractory disease phenotypes. We further discuss emerging concepts of personalized and integrated treatment strategies combining biologics, endoscopic sinus surgery, and aspirin desensitization. Finally, we highlight unmet needs, potential biomarkers and future research directions aimed at optimizing treatment selection and improving long-term disease control in N-ERD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.