ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Efficacy study of juxta-anastomotic stenosis of the arteriovenous fistula via percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with different accesses to the arteries and veins.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Juxta-anastomotic stenosis is a leading cause of dysfunction in arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) for hemodialysis. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is the primary treatment, but the optimal access approach remains unclear. This study compared the efficacy of arterial versus venous access PTA for treating juxta-anastomotic AVF stenosis and identified risk factors for post-PTA patency loss. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 267 patients who underwent PTA for AVF stenosis. Patients were divided into vein and artery groups based on access route. The study compared primary patency rates, intervention interval times, restenosis rates, and postoperative complications between the two groups. Factors affecting AVF patency were analyzed by Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves. Subgroup analysis was used to evaluate the variations in the relationships between relevant variables and patency under different access route baselines. Results: Compared with venous access, arterial access PTA demonstrated superior primary patency, with 6-month rates of 76.6% vs. 46.0% ( Conclusion: Compared with venous access, arterial access PTA offered superior primary patency and lower restenosis for juxta-anastomotic AVF lesions. Diabetes, elevated FDP, and D-Dimer predicted patency loss, with the prognostic impact varying according to the vascular access route.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.