SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2026
Novel nonsteroidal topical therapies for pediatric atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Novel nonsteroidal topical therapies are increasingly used for pediatric atopic dermatitis (AD), but their comparative efficacy and safety remain unclear because direct active-comparator evidence is limited. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating novel nonsteroidal topical therapies in children with AD. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261400624). Efficacy outcomes included Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success (IGA-TS), Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 response (EASI-75), and EASI-90. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Treatment nodes were defined by drug, concentration, and dosing frequency. Pairwise vehicle-controlled meta-analyses, sensitivity analysis, and subgroup analyses by treatment duration and age were also performed. Results: Twelve articles reporting 15 RCTs involving 3,994 pediatric patients were included. The network was largely centered on vehicle, with only one active-comparator trial. Most active regimens improved IGA-TS versus vehicle, except tapinarof 0.5% once daily. For EASI-75, five of ten evaluated active regimens showed significant benefit, while all six regimens evaluated for EASI-90 were superior to vehicle. Delgocitinib 0.5% twice daily ranked highest for IGA-TS and EASI-75, whereas difamilast 1% twice daily ranked highest for EASI-90. No consistent increase in TEAEs or TRAEs was observed. Pairwise meta-analyses and sensitivity analysis were generally consistent with the primary findings. Subgroup analyses suggested timepoint- and age-related differences, but stratified evidence was limited. Conclusion: Novel nonsteroidal topical therapies provide effective short-term steroid-sparing options for pediatric AD without a clear overall safety penalty. Further head-to-head, long-term, and age-stratified trials are needed. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identifier CRD420261400624.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.