Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42559101›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2026

Real-time multicenter semantic segmentation for laparoscopic gastrectomy: development, external validation and operating room deployment of an AI navigation system.

Ke-Cheng Zhang, Di Wu, Can-Rong Lu, Zhi Qiao, Wen-Tong Xu, Feng-Lin Liu, Jing-Yu Deng, Li Yang, Lei Guo, Tian-Yu Xie

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ke-Cheng ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Di WuDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Can-Rong LuDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhi QiaoDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Wen-Tong XuDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Feng-Lin LiuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jing-Yu DengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, Tianjin 300060, China.
Li YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Liyang Branch of Jiangsu Province Hospital, Jiangsu 213300, China.
Lei GuoDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
Tian-Yu XieDepartment of General Surgery, First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is technically demanding and errors often arise from limited situational awareness. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based computer vision may enhance intraoperative recognition of instruments and anatomy, but evidence for generalizable, real-time deployment remains limited. Methods: We conducted a multicenter study using laparoscopic gastrectomy videos from 4 tertiary hospitals. Data were split by institution into training, internal test, and external validation sets. A You Only Look Once version 10 (YOLOv10)-based model was developed to recognize 18 categories (11 instruments and 7 organs) and integrated into a lightweight user interface for bedside use. Mean average precision at Intersection over Union (IoU) 0.50 (mAP@50) and AP@[0.50-0.95] for boxes and masks, recall, and F1 score were calculated. The feasibility of live operating-room deployment was assessed. Surgeon cognitive workload was assessed using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX), and system usability was evaluated with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results: The training set comprised 4308 frames (41,066 labels); the internal testing set, 1803 frames (17,211 labels); and the external validation set, 721 frames (6685 labels). Training performance reached box precision 0.896, recall 0.891, mAP@50 0.937, and AP@[0.50-0.95] 0.846; mask AP@[0.50-0.95] was 0.809. On the internal testing set, box AP@[0.50-0.95] was 0.670 and mask AP@[0.50-0.95] 0.642. External validation achieved box precision 0.798, recall 0.773, F1 score 0.785, mAP@50 0.832, and AP@[0.50-0.95] 0.684; mask mAP@50 was 0.836 and AP@[0.50-0.95] 0.658. High-performing classes included stapler, ultrasonic scalpel, and forceps, whereas omentum and pancreas were relatively lower. The system operated in real time during laparoscopic gastrectomy on a laptop-grade GPU, providing on-demand overlays without workflow disruption. The NASA-TLX score was 26.72±6.51, indicating low cognitive burden, and the SUS score was 78.33±5.20, demonstrating good usability. Conclusions: We present development, external validation, and live deployment of a real-time AI navigation system for laparoscopic gastrectomy across multiple centers. The model demonstrated robust detection and segmentation of instruments and organs and was feasible for bedside use. Prospective trials are warranted to evaluate effects on intraoperative safety, efficiency, and training.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceGastrectomyLaparoscopyHumansOperating RoomsArtificial intelligence (AI)Computer visionIntraoperative navigationLaparoscopic gastrectomyMulticenter studyReal-time inferenceSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42559101
PMCPMC13440269

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.