ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Long COVID affects working memory: assessment using a single rapid online test.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Long COVID, or post-COVID-19 syndrome, is characterized by persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, including cognitive impairments such as "brain fog" that adversely affect quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of long COVID on working memory using a single, rapid, anonymous online survey and visual working memory quiz. Methods: We analyzed working memory scores in relation to reported long COVID status (clinically diagnosed, self-reported, and non-long COVID), age, number of COVID-19 infections, long COVID duration, and subjective ratings of brain fog severity and the overall life impact of symptoms. The study utilized the Rapid Objective Working Memory Assessment (ROWMA), a brief, gamified visual recognition task designed to maximize compliance and minimize fatigue. Results: A total of 1,064 participants aged 16 to over 85 years were recruited, with 39% reporting long COVID. Categorical regression revealed that long COVID status was the strongest predictor of working memory performance, followed by age and number of infections. Participants with long COVID performed significantly worse on the working memory quiz than non-long COVID controls, with the lowest scores observed in the clinically diagnosed group. Furthermore, working memory scores declined with age, particularly among those aged 35 and older, and decreased with multiple COVID-19 infections within the diagnosed group. Individuals in the diagnosed group reported the most severe brain fog and the greatest life impact, both of which strongly correlated with lower memory scores. Although longer long COVID duration was associated with lower memory performance, an exploratory analysis indicated this trend may have been influenced by the SARS-CoV-2 variant. Conclusion: Our results support the hypothesis that long COVID is associated with objective working memory impairment, particularly among individuals with a clinical diagnosis. These findings add to the growing body of evidence linking long COVID to objective cognitive difficulties. Moreover, the study advocates the use of rapid, single-task online cognitive assessments as a practical, scalable, and low-burden approach for evaluating working memory function in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.