ReviewRheumatology advances in practice2026
Current and future advances in practice: polyarteritis nodosa and related vasculitides.
Review in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a rare vasculitis affecting predominately medium-sized vessels. Our evolving understanding of PAN, including the role of HBV and discovery of monogenic variants such as deficiency of adenosine deaminase 2 (DADA2), has resulted in idiopathic PAN becoming a very rare condition with an annual incidence of 0.6-19.9/million. The investigative approach is to assess organ involvement and confirm the diagnosis either by imaging or biopsy. Conventional catheter angiography is being replaced by CT or MR angiography, which provide increasingly good resolution of the typical fusiform narrowing and aneurysm. ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) should be excluded. DADA2 is being more frequently identified as causing a PAN-like illness, especially in children; cases presenting in adulthood are now recognised. In children and most adults, genotyping for DADA2 should be undertaken. There are no high-quality randomised controlled trials of treatment in idiopathic PAN. Current approaches have been adapted from those used to treat other types of vasculitis. The five-factor score may be used to stratify patients to identify those needing intensive therapy with glucocorticoids combined with CYC. In order to reduce the burden of glucocorticoid toxicity, the ACR has advocated the use of immunosuppressive drugs in addition to steroids in those not initially receiving CYC. Unlike AAV, there appears to be little role for rituximab in the treatment of idiopathic PAN, although it is occasionally used as salvage therapy. HBV-associated PAN is treated with immunosuppression and antiviral therapy. There is reasonably good evidence to support the use of anti-TNF to treat DADA2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.