ArticleCureus2026
Association Between Probable Adult ADHD and Profession in India: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that may persist into adulthood. Adult ADHD remains understudied in India, particularly among professional groups.
objectivesThe objectives of the study are to determine the proportion of participants showing probable adult ADHD screening positivity through an online questionnaire and to compare screening positivity across various professional groups.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used an online questionnaire consisting of demographic information, associated factors, and the validated Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) screening tool. The questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA) to various professional groups across India. A cut-off score of 14 was used to identify probable ADHD.
resultsAmong 355 respondents, 115 (32.4%) showed probable adult ADHD screening positivity. Differences across professional groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Screening positivity was significantly associated with marital status and work environment in unadjusted chi-squared analysis. Participants who screened positive reported higher screen time across professional categories than those who screened negative.
conclusionsProbable adult ADHD screening positivity was observed across multiple professional groups and was not confined to a single occupation. The observed associations with relationship status and work environment should be interpreted as exploratory and non-causal. These findings support the need for workplace awareness, structured screening pathways, and further studies with clinical confirmation and multivariable analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.