ArticleEnvironments (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Combined Effects of PFAS and Metals on Cognitive Function.
Article in Environments (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Heavy metals and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are widespread environmental pollutants that have been linked to worsening cognition, but how the two classes act together to shape cognitive function is still not well characterized. Drawing on data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), this observational analysis evaluated how PFAS and metals are jointly related to performance across distinct cognitive domains in older adults. Methods: We analyzed 1447 adults aged 60 years and older from the 2011-2012 NHANES cycle in a cross-sectional design study. Metal levels in serum and whole blood were determined with standardized laboratory assays. Associations of single exposures and of the overall mixture with the CERAD word-learning and recall tasks, Animal Fluency, and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test were assessed using multivariable linear regression, together with Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR). Results: Single-exposure models produced largely modest and inconsistent associations across the cognitive measures. Within the mixture models, PFAS, especially PFOA, PFDE, and PFOS, were repeatedly flagged as influential across several domains, whereas the metals tended to matter for specific outcomes only. The strongest negative signals at elevated joint exposure emerged for memory-related measures, notably CERAD Trials 1 and 2. Conclusions: Joint exposure to PFAS and heavy metals appears to influence cognitive domains unevenly, with memory-related measures seeming more responsive as combined exposure rises. These results reinforce the value of mixture-oriented analytic strategies when investigating environmental contaminants in relation to cognitive aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.