ArticleMilitary medicine2026
A Novel Foam-Forming Hydrogel Containing Antibiotics Reduces the Degree of Bacterial Colonization and Improves Wound Healing in Thermal Burns When Compared to Silver Sulfadiazine.
Article in Military medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study compared a novel antibiotic hydrogel burn dressing to non-antibiotic hydrogel vehicle, standard of care (silver sulfadiazine), and untreated control in a 7-day porcine partial-thickness (second-degree) thermal burn model to assess for wound healing properties both in the presence and absence of bacterial inoculation. MATERIALS AND
methodsNineteen swine were enrolled and 18 completed Day 7 analysis. One was euthanized on Day 6 because of an unrelated injury. Eight burn wounds were created on each swine, with half of the wounds inoculated with Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wound treatment was randomized to 4 groups: foam-based hydrogel spray containing antibiotics (i.e., vancomycin and tobramycin), the same hydrogel vehicle without antibiotics, silver sulfadiazine, and no intervention. Observations and primary and secondary outcomes were assessed only on Day 7. A blinded pathologist graded the specimens for bacterial colonization and wound healing.
resultsThe antibiotic hydrogel demonstrated significantly less bacterial colonization when compared to hydrogel vehicle, silver sulfadiazine, and control (odds ratios of 0.02, 0.02, and 0.01, respectively). The antibiotic hydrogel also demonstrated statistically significant benefits to wound healing when compared to hydrogel vehicle, silver sulfadiazine, and control. Wound healing parameters were factors of histopathology: necrosis depth/length, ulceration, neutrophilic/granulocytic infiltrate, subcutis granulocytic/lymphocytic infiltrates, subcutis fibrosis, congestion, hemorrhage, and edema.
conclusionsIn a 7-day porcine partial thickness burn model, an antibiotic hydrogel foam reduced the degree of bacterial colonization and improved wound healing when compared to non-antibiotic hydrogel vehicle, standard of care, and control. Strengths of this study include the randomization of multiple treatment conditions, blinded pathology, and the inclusion of both inoculated and non-inoculated wounds with clinically relevant bacterial strains. Limitations include a modest sample size and limited quantitative bacteriology. A lightweight, portable foam-based antibiotic hydrogel spray may improve the early, prehospital treatment of thermal burns. Future work may assess use over longer time periods and body surface areas and increased quantitative microbiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.