ArticlePolish journal of microbiology2026
Microbial Signatures in Head and Neck versus Gastrointestinal Tumors: Identification and Prognostic Modeling.
Article in Polish journal of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study identified key intra-tumor microbial signatures distinguishing head and neck cancers from gastrointestinal cancers and explored their diagnostic and prognostic potential. Intra-tumor microbial data of five cancer types were obtained from the Cancer Microbiome Atlas, and corresponding clinical data were retrieved from the Cancer Genome Atlas. The Wilcoxon test was used to analyze differences in microbial populations. Univariate logistic regression, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, and recursive feature elimination were sequentially applied to screen optimal microbial markers, and a support vector machine classification model was constructed. A nomogram model and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to validate the predictive and prognostic value of the optimal microbes, respectively. Overall, 463 tumor samples and 47 controls were included. Twenty-three microbes showed significant differences in distribution between head and neck and gastrointestinal tumors; among these, eight overlapping microbes were selected as optimal markers. The SVM model based on these eight microbes achieved AUCs of 0.937 and 0.856 in the training and validation datasets, respectively. The nomogram model constructed with these markers showed high predictive accuracy (C-index = 0.8944 in training, 0.8023 in validation). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that high abundance of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.