Evidence mapPaperPMID 42560615Full record

ArticleCurrent diabetes reports2026

Applications of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Cognitive Research in Diabetes: a Scoping Review.

Jeeyeon Kim, Jayeong Kim, Heather Cuevas, Anna Kratz

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Current diabetes reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jeeyeon KimDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. jeeyeonk@umich.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-4463
Jayeong KimSeoul National University College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5760-8828
Heather CuevasSchool of Nursing, University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River St, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4314-6686
Anna KratzDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, North Campus Research Complex Building 16, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-3898

Funding

National Multiple Sclerosis Society MB-2307-42800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewContinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has increasingly been incorporated into studies examining cognitive function in people with diabetes. This scoping review systematically maps how CGM has been applied in cognitive research among individuals with diabetes to characterize current methodological approaches, identify key knowledge gaps, and inform future research. RECENT

findingsA scoping review was conducted following Arksey and O'Malley's framework. A systematic search of five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PsycINFO) was performed. Cognitive outcomes were extracted and mapped to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. CGM data completeness was consistently high, with 84-100% of expected CGM data captured, supporting the feasibility of intensive glucose monitoring in cognitive research in diabetes. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in cognitive domains and assessment tools. Most studies evaluated executive function, memory, and attention, whereas psychomotor, language, and perceived cognitive functions were less frequently assessed. More than 10 distinct instruments were used to assess memory and executive function. Across studies, similar cognitive domains were examined regardless of the specific CGM metrics employed. Research examining CGM and cognitive function in diabetes is characterized by substantial methodological variability in both CGM metrics and cognitive assessments. These findings underscore the need for greater standardization to improve cross-study comparability and to advance CGM-informed cognitive research, including the development of personalized interventions to support cognitive health through optimized glucose management in people with diabetes.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCognitionDiabetes MellitusContinuous Glucose MonitoringHumansBlood GlucoseCognitive functionContinuous glucose monitoringDiabetesScoping review

Identifiers

PMID42560615
PMCPMC13447455

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.