Evidence mapPaperPMID 42560674Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Role-Playing-Based Physician Training and Metabolic Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yifei Zhang, Ying Peng, Yufei Chen, Tingyu Ke, Fengmei Xu, Shengli Wu, Yuancheng Dai, Lin Sun, Qidong Zheng, Zhuomeng Hu and 16 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05715307 (Chinese Endocrinologists Health Education Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05715307 nacompletednot on this map

Chinese Endocrinologists Health Education Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRan2023 to 2024Enrolled2,017ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsIntensive training for endocrinologists in T2DM management, Regular training for endocrinologists in T2DM management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Yifei ZhangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ying PengDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yufei ChenDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tingyu KeDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Fengmei XuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Hebi Coal (Group) Ltd, General Hospital, Hebi, China.
Shengli WuEndocrine and Metabolic Center, Karamay Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine (Karamay People's Hospital), Karamay, China.
Yuancheng DaiDepartment of Endocrinology, Sheyang Diabetes Hospital, Yancheng, China.
Lin SunDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qidong ZhengDepartment of Endocrinology, Yuhuan Second People's Hospital, Taizhou, China.
Zhuomeng HuDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qijuan DongDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, China.
Juan ShiDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xueyi WuDepartment of Endocrinology, The Second People's Hospital of Guiyang (Jinyang Hospital)/The Affiliated Jinyang Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
Yu ShiDepartment of Endocrinology, Qidong People's Hospital/Qidong Liver Cancer Institute/Affiliated Qidong Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Rong TangDepartment of Endocrinology, Panzhou No. 2 People's Hospital, Liupanshui, China.
Yubo ShaDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, People's Hospital of Dali City, Dali, China.
Rongyue ChenDepartment of Endocrinology, Xuchang Hongyue Diabetes Hospital, Xuchang, China.
Bin XuDepartment of Endocrinology, Biyang County People's Hospital, Zhumadian, China.
Shu LiDepartment of Endocrinology, Huizhou Central People's Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Lianyong LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shanghai Punan Hospital of Pudong New District, Shanghai, China.
Mingdian GaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Changyi People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Dong ZhaoCenter for Endocrine Metabolism and Immune Diseases, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qinghua YiDepartment of Endocrinology and Nephrology, The People's Hospital of Guandu District, Kunming, China.
Zhiqiang KangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Weiqing WangDepartment of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Chinese Endocrinologists Health Education Study (CREATION) group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Global glycemic control in diabetes is suboptimal, with persistent gaps between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a role-playing-based intensive training program for physicians in improving glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, 2-arm parallel, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at 205 centers in China, with enrollment from February 13 to September 19, 2023, and 12-month follow-up completed on October 25, 2024. In phase 1, 205 physicians from qualified diabetes centers across China were enrolled from February 13 to April 29, 2023, and randomly assigned to the intensive training group (n = 103) and the regular training group (n = 102). In phase 2, 2017 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled from February 28 to September 19, 2023. Data were analyzed from January 1 to June 1, 2025. Interventions: One-week on-site role-playing-based intensive training (involving simulating patient roles in experiencing diabetes-related health examinations, complication scenarios, lifestyle intervention, and face-to-face conversations) vs regular training. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of less than 7.0% at 6 months. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 205 physicians (mean [SD] age, 36.2 [5.1] years; 155 women [75.6%]) and 2017 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.0 [7.0] years; 713 women [35.3%] and 1304 men [64.7%]) were enrolled, with 1009 patients in the intensive training group and 1008 patients in the regular training group. At 6 months, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the intensive training group achieved an HbA1c level less than 7.0% compared with the regular training group (58.0% [476 of 820] vs 42.9% [351 of 818]), with an adjusted between-group difference of 16.6% (95% CI, 7.2%-25.7%; P < .001). At 12 months, the difference between the intensive training group and the regular training group remained significant (60.9% [502 of 824] vs 44.6% [371 of 832]; adjusted between-group difference, 17.0% [95% CI, 7.0%-26.8%]; P < .001). The intensive group had greater reductions in body mass index (adjusted between-group difference, -0.3 [95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1]), waist circumference (adjusted between-group difference, -1.4 cm [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.8 cm]), fasting glucose (adjusted between-group difference, -6.3 mg/dL [95% CI, -10.7 to -1.9 mg/dL]), and systolic blood pressure (adjusted between-group difference, -1.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -2.9 to -0.1 mm Hg]). Serious adverse events were comparable between groups (intensive group, 2.6% [26 of 1009]; regular group, 2.4% [24 of 1008]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial of role-playing-based intensive training for physicians managing type 2 diabetes, the intervention significantly improved patient glycemic control. These findings suggest a feasible strategy to narrow the guideline-implementation gap in diabetes care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05715307.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Education, Medical, ContinuingGlycemic ControlPhysiciansRole PlayingAdultChinaFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID42560674
PMCPMC13448795

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.