Trial reportJAMA network open2026
Role-Playing-Based Physician Training and Metabolic Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05715307 (Chinese Endocrinologists Health Education Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Chinese Endocrinologists Health Education Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Global glycemic control in diabetes is suboptimal, with persistent gaps between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a role-playing-based intensive training program for physicians in improving glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, 2-arm parallel, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted at 205 centers in China, with enrollment from February 13 to September 19, 2023, and 12-month follow-up completed on October 25, 2024. In phase 1, 205 physicians from qualified diabetes centers across China were enrolled from February 13 to April 29, 2023, and randomly assigned to the intensive training group (n = 103) and the regular training group (n = 102). In phase 2, 2017 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled from February 28 to September 19, 2023. Data were analyzed from January 1 to June 1, 2025. Interventions: One-week on-site role-playing-based intensive training (involving simulating patient roles in experiencing diabetes-related health examinations, complication scenarios, lifestyle intervention, and face-to-face conversations) vs regular training. Main Outcomes and Measures: The proportion of patients achieving a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of less than 7.0% at 6 months. The primary analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 205 physicians (mean [SD] age, 36.2 [5.1] years; 155 women [75.6%]) and 2017 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.0 [7.0] years; 713 women [35.3%] and 1304 men [64.7%]) were enrolled, with 1009 patients in the intensive training group and 1008 patients in the regular training group. At 6 months, a significantly greater proportion of patients in the intensive training group achieved an HbA1c level less than 7.0% compared with the regular training group (58.0% [476 of 820] vs 42.9% [351 of 818]), with an adjusted between-group difference of 16.6% (95% CI, 7.2%-25.7%; P < .001). At 12 months, the difference between the intensive training group and the regular training group remained significant (60.9% [502 of 824] vs 44.6% [371 of 832]; adjusted between-group difference, 17.0% [95% CI, 7.0%-26.8%]; P < .001). The intensive group had greater reductions in body mass index (adjusted between-group difference, -0.3 [95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1]), waist circumference (adjusted between-group difference, -1.4 cm [95% CI, -2.1 to -0.8 cm]), fasting glucose (adjusted between-group difference, -6.3 mg/dL [95% CI, -10.7 to -1.9 mg/dL]), and systolic blood pressure (adjusted between-group difference, -1.5 mm Hg [95% CI, -2.9 to -0.1 mm Hg]). Serious adverse events were comparable between groups (intensive group, 2.6% [26 of 1009]; regular group, 2.4% [24 of 1008]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cluster randomized clinical trial of role-playing-based intensive training for physicians managing type 2 diabetes, the intervention significantly improved patient glycemic control. These findings suggest a feasible strategy to narrow the guideline-implementation gap in diabetes care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05715307.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.