SynthesisJAMA network open2026
Intravenous Thrombolysis Beyond the Conventional Time Window for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Errors in Figure 4.JAMA network open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is an established therapy for acute ischemic stroke when administered within 4.5 hours of symptom onset. However, many patients present beyond this window or with unknown onset, and recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated whether imaging-selected patients may benefit from thrombolysis in the extended window. Objective: To evaluate the functional and safety outcomes associated with IVT administered 4.5 hours or more after stroke onset. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from database inception through March 3, 2026. Study Selection: RCTs enrolling adults with acute ischemic stroke treated with IVT 4.5 hours or more after symptom onset were included. Trials comparing thrombolysis with placebo or standard medical care and reporting functional or safety outcomes were eligible. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences with 95% CIs were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were excellent functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores of 0-1 at 90 days), good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale scores of 0-2 at 90 days), all-cause 90-day mortality, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Results: Fourteen RCTs including 4174 patients (2102 in the thrombolysis group and 2072 in the control group) were analyzed, 9 of which were published within the past 5 years. IVT was associated with a higher likelihood of excellent functional outcome (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31) and good functional outcome (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06-1.18) at 90 days. Mortality did not differ between groups (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.93-1.38), but thrombolysis was associated with an increased the risk of symptomatic ICH (RR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.45-4.09). Absolute treatment effects corresponded to a number needed to treat of 12 to 16 for an additional favorable outcome and a number needed to harm of 62 for symptomatic ICH. Conclusions and Relevance: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 RCTs, IVT administered beyond 4.5 hours after stroke onset was associated with improved functional outcomes despite an increased risk of symptomatic ICH, supporting extension of thrombolytic therapy beyond the conventional treatment window in appropriately imaging-selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.