Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42561383›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Trust-Centered Design and Feasibility Evaluation of an AI-Enabled Conversational Health Tool for Sexual and Reproductive Health Among Rural Young Adults: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

Kandyce Brennan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kandyce BrennanSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, United States, (919) 966-4260.ORCID 0000-0001-8729-7828

Funding

UNC Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12AR085544 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Gaurav Dave, Michelle Meyer · 2025 to 2026
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR085544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young adults aged 18 to 25 years in rural communities face barriers to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) information, including clinician shortages, clinic closures, and privacy concerns in close-knit communities. Many rely on online sources of varying quality; one analysis found that 40% of birth control video content is inaccurate or misleading. AI-enabled conversational health tools (chatbots) may provide scalable SRH information, but implementation may be constrained by low institutional trust, privacy concerns, and rural users' underrepresentation in AI development. SARHAchat is an AI-enabled SRH conversational health tool developed through prior work. This protocol describes a study to co-design and evaluate SARHAchat with rural young adults, treating trust as a design input rather than a postdeployment outcome. Objective: This study aims to (1) identify multilevel determinants of trust and acceptability for AI-enabled conversational health tools among rural pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years in North and South Carolina; (2) co-design a SARHAchat prototype with rural stakeholders using human-centered design; and (3) evaluate its feasibility, acceptability, usability, trust, and implementation outcomes in a pilot. The goal is to develop methods that support responsible implementation of conversational AI health tools in rural and underserved communities. Methods: This protocol uses a 3-phase mixed methods design with exploratory sequential logic. In phase 1, we will conduct semistructured interviews (target n=24) with pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years living in Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-designated rural counties in North and South Carolina to identify determinants of trust and acceptability and develop a conceptual framework. In phase 2, we will convene 5 to 8 stakeholders per session across 2 community feedback sessions to co-design and refine SARHAchat. In phase 3, we will conduct a nonrandomized mixed methods feasibility pilot with 75 pregnancy-capable individuals aged 18 to 25 years from rural counties, recruited through community-identified social media platforms. Results: This proposal was funded in February 2026. All 3 phases have been approved by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Institutional Review Board (26-0669). A total of 14 participants have enrolled in phase 1. Phase 2 co-design activities are planned for August to October 2026, and phase 3 pilot recruitment is expected to begin in January 2027, with data collection concluding in October 2027. Findings are anticipated to be submitted for publication in April 2028. Conclusions: This protocol describes a feasibility study of a community-informed AI-enabled conversational SRH tool for rural young adults. By identifying trust-related design needs, refining a prototype through co-design, and generating preliminary feasibility, acceptability, usability, and implementation data, the study aims to establish trust-by-design methods that guide future effectiveness testing and may transfer to other sensitive health domains and underserved communities.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceReproductive HealthSexual HealthTrustAdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNorth CarolinaRural PopulationSouth CarolinaYoung AdultAIartificial intelligencechatbotconversational agentsdigital health equityfeasibilityhealth disparitieshuman-centered designimplementation sciencemixed methodsrural healthsexual and reproductive healthtrust

Identifiers

PMID42561383
PMCPMC13446796

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.