ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026
From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.
Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advances in Poultry RNA-Omics Research: Technologies, RNA Information Layers, and Applications in Complex Traits.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) has revolutionized animal breeding by accelerating genetic gain through genome-wide marker data. As genotyping technologies advance and data dimensionality grows, the statistical foundations of GS are shifting from classical linear frameworks, which assume additive genetic effects, toward advanced computational models that capture complex nonlinear relationships in genomic data. The commercialization of genotyping arrays for livestock and poultry, coupled with steadily declining sequencing costs, has led to an exponential increase in the availability of high-density genomic data. However, challenges persist, including scenarios where the number of genetic markers far exceeds the number of samples with phenotypic data, and the growing complexity of relationships within genomic data. These issues significantly limit the applicability of traditional evaluation models. In parallel, computational power has increased significantly over the last few decades, providing the capacity necessary for highly complex analyses. While traditional linear mixed models provide a robust framework for incorporating biological priors and modeling additive genetic effects, they often rely on simplified assumptions. In contrast, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, which do not rely on predefined parametric models, are well-suited to capturing complex nonlinear relationships and offer effective solutions to the aforementioned challenges. This review provides a comprehensive overview of GS methodologies. We first cover the statistical foundations of linear mixed and Bayesian models, and then survey modern ML and DL approaches. We discuss the assumptions, advantages, and limitations of each method and, by comparing the computational efficiency and predictive accuracy of these diverse approaches, aim to provide practical guidance for optimizing genomic evaluation strategies in the era of big data breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.