Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42563180›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2026

From linear models to deep learning: statistical advances in genomic selection for animal breeding.

Lifei Zhang, Mingzhu Zhang, Xinle Wang, Cancan Chen, Shunzhe Wang, Yujie Zhao, Yanjun Zhang, Ruijun Wang, Yongbin Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lifei ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Mingzhu ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Xinle WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Cancan ChenCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Shunzhe WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Yujie ZhaoCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Yanjun ZhangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China.
Ruijun WangCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China. nmgwrj@126.com.
Yongbin LiuCollege of Animal Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, 010018, China. Liuyongbin@imau.edu.cn.

Funding

the Construction and Demonstration of a Genomic Information and Smart Breeding Platform for Meat-Producing Animals 2025KJHZ005the Earnmarked Fund for China Agriculture Re-search System of Mutton Sheep CARS-38the Fundamental Research Funds of Directily Subordinate Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region BR251201the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Breeding Joint Research Project YZ2023011the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region "Leading the Charge with Open Competition" topic 2022JBGS0024the Program for Innovative Research Team in Universities of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region NMGIRT2322the Research on Key Technologies for Breeding New Strains of Low-Fat and High-Yield Grassland Short-Tailed Sheep NC2024005the Science and Technology Plan of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2023KYPT0021the Science and Technology Program of the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2025YFHH0226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has revolutionized animal breeding by accelerating genetic gain through genome-wide marker data. As genotyping technologies advance and data dimensionality grows, the statistical foundations of GS are shifting from classical linear frameworks, which assume additive genetic effects, toward advanced computational models that capture complex nonlinear relationships in genomic data. The commercialization of genotyping arrays for livestock and poultry, coupled with steadily declining sequencing costs, has led to an exponential increase in the availability of high-density genomic data. However, challenges persist, including scenarios where the number of genetic markers far exceeds the number of samples with phenotypic data, and the growing complexity of relationships within genomic data. These issues significantly limit the applicability of traditional evaluation models. In parallel, computational power has increased significantly over the last few decades, providing the capacity necessary for highly complex analyses. While traditional linear mixed models provide a robust framework for incorporating biological priors and modeling additive genetic effects, they often rely on simplified assumptions. In contrast, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms, which do not rely on predefined parametric models, are well-suited to capturing complex nonlinear relationships and offer effective solutions to the aforementioned challenges. This review provides a comprehensive overview of GS methodologies. We first cover the statistical foundations of linear mixed and Bayesian models, and then survey modern ML and DL approaches. We discuss the assumptions, advantages, and limitations of each method and, by comparing the computational efficiency and predictive accuracy of these diverse approaches, aim to provide practical guidance for optimizing genomic evaluation strategies in the era of big data breeding.

Indexed as

Animal breedingBayesianDeep learningGBLUPGEBVGenomic selectionMachine learningPrediction accuracyssGBLUP

Identifiers

PMID42563180
PMCPMC13449407

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.