ArticleJournal of Korean biological nursing science2026
[Identification of sex-specific sarcopenia risk groups among older adults using decision tree modeling: a cross-sectional study based on the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey].
Article in Journal of Korean biological nursing science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify sex-specific sarcopenia risk groups among older adults. Methods: Data were obtained from 1,870 Korean adults aged 65 years or older who participated in the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey between 2022 and 2023. Sarcopenia was evaluated based on hand grip strength and skeletal muscle mass. Statistical analyses incorporating complex sample methods, along with decision tree analysis, were conducted using SPSS version 29.0. Results: The prevalence of reduced muscle strength, decreased muscle mass, and sarcopenia was 14.7%, 30.2%, and 8.1%, respectively. Sarcopenia was observed in 6.4% of men and 9.7% of women. In men, eleven sarcopenia risk pathways were identified based on age, anemia, education level, body mass index (BMI), perceived health status, hemoglobin A1c, diabetes, diastolic blood pressure, income, living status, acceptable macronutrient distribution range (AMDR) for protein, and aerobic exercise. The strongest predictor of sarcopenia risk in men was age ≥ 77 years, in combination with low educational attainment and anemia. In women, six sarcopenia risk pathways were identified based on age, BMI, AMDR for protein, high density lipoprotein-cholesterol, triglycerides, and living status. The strongest predictor of sarcopenia risk in women was age ≥ 74 years combined with low BMI. Conclusion: Sarcopenia risk factors and pathways differed substantially by sex among older adults. These findings suggest that sex-specific screening and targeted prevention strategies may be effective in reducing sarcopenia risk in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.