ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Examining physiological parameters of mental workload in the cockpit: a multimethod approach.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing automation in the cockpit and the focus on adaptive assistance systems that provide tailored assistance to the pilots, it becomes increasingly relevant to monitor the pilots' state. While many different psychophysiological measurement methods have been utilized in previous studies, they each have drawbacks and limitations that need to be overcome to provide a valid and reliable operator state assessment. In the present study, we investigated the assessment of mental workload (MWL) using a multimethod approach and combination of different physiological measurements (including neurophysiological, central and peripheral measures as well as eye-tracking) during a simulated flight task. A 60-minute simplified flight task was conducted with 14 commercial airline pilots in four difficulty levels, while their physiological, performance and self-report data were collected. Our analyses reveal that especially neurophysiological measures (electroencephalography [EEG], functional near-infrared spectroscopy [fNIRS]) and measures of heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV, specifically avNN) were able to differentiate the induced levels of MWL, and that different measures performed better in low and others in high MWL levels. Thus, we argue for a combination of physiological measures to assess MWL for future cockpit applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.