Evidence mapPaperPMID 42564022Full record

ReviewFrontiers in dementia2026

Physical activity and exercise in dementia: clinical relevance and emerging insights.

Thyparambil Aravindakshan Pramodkumar, Viswanathan Mohan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thyparambil Aravindakshan PramodkumarDepartment of Research Operations and Diabetes Complications, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Viswanathan MohanChairman, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (ICMR-Collaborating Centre of Excellence) and Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre (IDF Centre of Excellence in Diabetes), Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia continues to pose a growing challenge worldwide, particularly in aging populations where effective disease-modifying treatments remain limited. In this context, attention has increasingly shifted toward non-pharmacological approaches, including physical activity and structured exercise. Evidence accumulated over the past decade suggests that regular exercise may offer modest but meaningful benefits across several domains. These include improvements in cognitive function-especially executive function and attention-as well as gains in mobility, daily functioning, and psychological well-being. While the extent of cognitive improvement varies across studies, a consistent pattern emerges indicating greater benefit when interventions are initiated earlier in the disease course. Beyond clinical outcomes, several biological mechanisms have been proposed, including enhanced cerebral perfusion, upregulation of neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and attenuation of neuroinflammatory processes. At the same time, challenges remain. Differences in exercise protocols, issues related to adherence, and variability in patient populations make it difficult to define an optimal approach. Despite these limitations, physical activity represents a practical, low-cost strategy that can be integrated into routine care. Further research is needed to refine intervention design and understand long-term effects.

Indexed as

cognitivedementiadiabetesexercisephysical activitytherapies

Identifiers

PMID42564022
PMCPMC13441810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.