ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Potential heterogeneity of epcoritamab associated adverse events in demographics and dosing regimens.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epcoritamab shows potentially curable efficacy in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, but potential heterogeneity in its adverse events (AEs) across demographics and dosing regimens remain unexplored. Methods: This study comprehensively analyzed potential heterogeneity of epcoritamab associated AEs using the data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and supplemented it with data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Based on the clinical characteristics of the epcoritamab-associated AE reports, the potential heterogeneity of AEs across demographic and dosing regimen subgroups was investigated via reporting odds ratio algorithm and Fisher's exact test with Bonferroni correction. Subsequently, sensitivity analysis was performed to validate the potential variations. Results: Patients receiving 0.16 mg dose reported significantly higher frequency of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), especially within the first four treatment weeks. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported with a significantly higher frequency among patients over the age of 65 compared to those aged 18-65. Conclusion: This study revealed the potential heterogeneity of epcoritamab associated AEs in demographics and dosing regimens. Enhanced CRS monitoring should be prioritized during the initial administration of epcoritamab treatment. Monitoring ICANS may be of particular importance in older patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the case causality of these associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.