ArticleFrontiers in antibiotics2026
Evaluation of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a first-line surveillance typing tool for
Article in Frontiers in antibiotics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) has been evaluated as a typing method for a number of pathogens; however, very little research has been conducted on the genus Serratia. Methods: We examined whether FTIR was able to correctly cluster clinical isolates of Serratia to a comparable degree as whole genome sequencing (WGS) coupled with a subsequent bioinformatic comparison, the gold standard for determining phylogenetic relationships in epidemiology. FTIR was performed with the IR Biotyper (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) using the standard settings. Over a period of six weeks, 28 Serratia isolates found in clinical and environmental hygiene samples investigated in our laboratory were collected and preserved. Retrospective strain typing was performed using both methods, and the results were subsequently compared. Results: Our study showed a PPV of 0.842 for the correct identification of closely related isolates and an NPV of 1.0 for the correct identification of unrelated isolates. Concordance was measured using the Adjusted Rand index (AR) and the Adjusted Wallace coefficient (AW), with WGS and subsequent bioinformatic analysis as the reference method. This resulted in an AR of 0.742. Discussion: Our findings indicate, although with some limitations, the utility of using the IR Biotyper as a rapid and cost-effective first-line screening tool for investigating the epidemiological relatedness of Serratia spp. in a clinical microbiology laboratory when an outbreak is suspected. Consequently, the FTIR method may provide a complementary analytical addition to the arsenals of clinical microbiology laboratories that carry out epidemiological surveillance to aid infection control in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.