ArticleCureus2026
Comparative Evaluation of Photobiomodulation and Intracanal Cryotherapy on Post-Endodontic Pain Following Single-Visit Root Canal Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain following root canal treatment (RCT) remains a clinically relevant concern despite continuing refinements in endodontic technique. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and intracanal cryotherapy in reducing post-endodontic pain following a single-visit RCT. Methods Ninety adults requiring RCT of an asymptomatic mandibular first molar were allocated by computer-generated randomization into three parallel groups (n = 30 each): Group 1 (Control), final irrigation with 20 mL of room-temperature saline; Group 2 (PBMT), final saline irrigation followed by intraoral transmucosal 940 nm diode laser irradiation at 0.1 W for 40 s at each of four mucosal points (4 J per point; 16 J total per session); and Group 3 (Cryotherapy), final irrigation with 20 mL of chilled saline (2°C-4°C). Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) at 6, 24, and 48 hours and at 7 days, with parallel recording of rescue analgesic intake. Intergroup comparisons of the non-normally distributed pain and analgesic data used the Kruskal-Wallis test; categorical data were compared by the chi-square test (α = 0.05). Results No statistically significant intergroup differences in VAS pain scores or analgesic intake were observed at any time point (p > 0.05). The cryotherapy group recorded the lowest mean pain score at six hours (0.53 ± 0.90) and the PBMT group at 24 hours (0.33 ± 0.76). All three groups reached a VAS of 0 by day 7, and no analgesic was consumed in any group at day 7. Conclusions Within the limits of this trial, neither PBMT nor intracanal cryotherapy conferred a statistically significant analgesic advantage over conventional saline irrigation following single-visit RCT in asymptomatic patients. As this population had minimal preoperative pain, the result should not be extrapolated to symptomatic patients, in whom adjunctive therapies may still be beneficial. This indicates that, in asymptomatic cases, meticulous canal disinfection and adherence to fundamental endodontic principles remain the principal determinants of postoperative outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.