ReviewHealth science reports2026
Melatonin and Lactation in Ruminants Dairy Animals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.
Review in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Melatonin is present in breast milk with a diurnal pattern, potentially supporting early circadian rhythm development. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exogenous melatonin supplementation, compared with no treatment or placebo, on milk yield, milk composition, somatic cell count, colostrum composition, and neonatal growth outcomes in lactating ruminant livestock. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted up to March 15, 2026. All continuous outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMD) to account for variability in measurement scales across studies. Results: We identified 25 eligible studies in lactating animals. Melatonin supplementation did not significantly alter milk yield across species (SMD = 0.49). Significant improvements were observed in milk fat (SMD = 0.77) and protein content (SMD = 0.39), particularly in cows. Melatonin also significantly reduced somatic cell count (SMD = -1.98). Other components such as lactose, total solids, and solid not fats showed no significant change. Neonatal outcomes, including birth weight, weight at weaning, and daily gain, showed no significant improvement. Colostrum analysis showed a small increase in lactose content but no consistent effects on fat, protein, or IgG. However, most pooled analyses demonstrated substantial heterogeneity (I Conclusion: Exogenous melatonin shows potential for improving milk quality and mammary health in ruminant dairy animals, but its impact on milk yield and neonatal development remains unclear. These preclinical findings are hypothesis‑generating, and carefully designed clinical studies would be required before considering melatonin use in lactating women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.