ArticleNeuroprotection (Chichester, England)2026
Serum elemental profile-based machine learning models for Alzheimer's disease identification and cognitive score prediction.
Article in Neuroprotection (Chichester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current diagnostic approaches for Alzheimer's disease (AD) largely rely on cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging, which may be invasive, costly, and not readily accessible in routine clinical settings. We investigated whether serum elemental profiling combined with machine learning could provide complementary information for AD identification and exploratory cognitive score prediction. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 874 participants enrolled between 2017 and 2023 from the Brain Aging National Cohort-Peking Union Medical College cohort, comprising 427 cognitively normal controls (NCs) and 447 patients with clinically defined AD. Serum concentrations of 20 elements were quantified by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Associations between serum element concentrations and AD status were evaluated using age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression models with false discovery rate (FDR) correction. Associations with Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores were assessed using linear regression models with FDR correction. Machine learning classification models were developed for AD identification, whereas regression models were developed for exploratory MMSE and MoCA score prediction. Model performance was evaluated in an internal hold-out test set. Results: Age did not differ significantly between NC and AD participants (66.4 ± 9.9 vs. 67.1 ± 9.0 years; Conclusion: Serum elemental profiles combined with machine learning may provide a minimally invasive and accessible complementary approach for AD identification and cognitive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.