ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Stroke knowledge and awareness among adults in the West Bank: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stroke, or cerebrovascular disease, stands as one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and the fourth leading cause in the West Bank, accounting for approximately 12.1% of all deaths. There is scarce information about the level of knowledge and awareness of stroke among Palestinians in the West Bank. This study aims to identify knowledge gaps to support the development of preventive strategies. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted across the West Bank between September and December 2024. A sample of 513 participants from various regions of the West Bank completed a self-report questionnaire assessing knowledge of stroke symptoms, risk factors, prevention, management, and sources of information. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Results: Most participants (93.4%) correctly identified the brain as the organ affected by stroke, and 77.4% knew that stroke can reoccur. Only 5.3% knew the 4.5-h treatment window for stroke intervention. Hypertension was the most recognized risk factor (95.3%), followed by chronic stress (86.4%) and high cholesterol (79.3%). Confusion (92.0%), numbness (88.3%), facial deviation (83.8%) and vomiting (56.5%) were the most recognized symptoms, whereas 49.1% incorrectly identified nosebleeds as a stroke symptom. Regarding the response to stroke, 40% of the participants would call an ambulance, whereas 34% would take the patient to the hospital. Significant gaps in knowledge were associated with information sources, as participants relying on healthcare providers had significantly higher knowledge scores than those relying on the internet, friends, or other sources. Conclusion: Significant gaps in knowledge were detected, particularly regarding treatment urgency and symptom recognition. Our findings emphasize the need for targeted public health campaigns, especially among high-risk groups in the West Bank.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.