ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026
Trunk rotation coordination in front crawl: which segment leads? Three coordination strategies and their dynamic changes across 400-m split progression in elite swimmers.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To identify upper-trunk-pelvic roll coordination strategies during 400-m front-crawl swimming and examine their kinematic characteristics, segment-wise distribution, and associations with swimming speed. Methods: Twenty-two elite male swimmers completed a maximal 400-m front-crawl trial while two inertial measurement units recorded upper-trunk and pelvic roll. Cycle-level cross-correlation lag was used to classify coordination into upper-trunk-leading (UL), pelvic-leading (PL), and near-synchronous (NS) strategies. Kinematic differences among strategies and changes in strategy probability across 50-m segments and swimming speed were examined using Bayesian multilevel models. Results: Across 2,796 valid roll cycles, NS was the most frequent strategy (53.04%), followed by PL (25.86%) and UL (21.10%). Strategy use varied substantially between swimmers. UL showed greater torso twist range than NS (NS-UL = -0.71, 95% CrI: -0.96 to -0.42) and greater torso twist velocity than both NS (NS-UL = -0.61, 95% CrI: -0.95 to -0.26) and PL (UL-PL = 0.62, 95% CrI: 0.19-1.04). In contrast, upper-trunk and pelvic roll ranges were larger in NS and PL than in UL, with no clear difference between NS and PL. Faster within-athlete speed increased the odds of UL relative to both NS (OR = 2.38, 95% CrI: 1.76-3.26) and PL (OR = 2.07, 95% CrI: 1.31-3.33). No clear segment effects or between-athlete mean speed effects were observed. Conclusion: Elite 400-m front-crawl swimmers used three distinct upper-trunk-pelvic lead-lag strategies, with marked inter-individual variability. NS was most common, whereas UL was more likely at faster within-athlete speeds. These findings suggest that trunk coordination in elite swimmers is individualized rather than organized around a single optimal pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.