ReviewAfrican journal of laboratory medicine2026
Array comparative genomic hybridisation in haematological malignancies: A comprehensive review.
Review in African journal of laboratory medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Haematologic malignancies have diverse and complex genomic abnormalities, and the correct identification is essential for making the appropriate diagnosis, providing a prognosis, and planning treatment. Improved array comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) can provide high-resolution, genome-wide copy number variation detection, and overcomes conventional cytogenetic limitations. Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the role of array CGH in characterising genomic aberrations of haematologic malignancies, focusing on technical advantages, added diagnostic values, and implications for disease reclassification and precision medicine. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was conducted to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic performance and clinical utility of array CGH in haematologic cancers. Results: Array CGH detects genomic alterations at kilobase-level resolution and reveals additional abnormalities in approximately 30% of cases with normal results by conventional cytogenetics. It improves molecular subtyping, identifies novel prognostic marker and, when combined with single nucleotide polymorphism arrays, enables detection of uniparental disomy and copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, thereby enhancing diagnostic yield. Conclusion: Array CGH detects up to 90% of known genomic abnormalities in haematologic malignancies, and its integration with other genomic platforms will considerably enhance diagnostic precision and clinical care for haematopoietic neoplasms. What this study adds: This review emphasises the important role of array CGH's greater sensitivity to clinically relevant copy number changes compared to routine cytogenetics. Clinical applications of array CGH support precision oncology, especially when combined with single nucleotide polymorphism array or next-generation sequencing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.