Observational studyFrontiers in public health2026
Prevalence and determinants of infection risk in hospitalised adults: a multicentre cross-sectional study using a structured risk assessment tool.
Observational study in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated infections remain a major public health challenge, contributing to increased morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stays, and healthcare costs. Systematic assessment of infection risk is essential to support preventive strategies and improve patient safety however remains insufficiently structured in many clinical settings. Objective: To estimate the prevalence of infection risk among hospitalised adults and to identify intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with high infection risk using a structured risk assessment instrument. Methods: A multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in adult inpatient wards across multiple Local Health Units of the Portuguese National Health Service during 2025. Infection risk was assessed using the Risk Assessment for Infection (RAC) scale, which evaluates intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors. Risk stratification was performed using complementary approaches, including receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis and percentile-based classification. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical requirements. Results: A total of 1,092 hospitalised adults were included. Most participants were classified as having moderate (53.6%) or high (11.4%) infection risk according to percentile-based stratification. Higher risk levels were significantly associated with intrinsic factors such as older age, multimorbidity, impaired tissue integrity, and reduced mobility, as well as extrinsic factors including previous hospitalisation, intra- or inter-hospital transfer, prolonged length of stay, invasive procedures, and pharmacological therapy. ROC analysis identified a cut-off point with good discriminative performance, while percentile-based stratification enabled a more granular three-level risk classification. Patients hospitalised in medical wards had significantly higher risk scores compared with those in surgical wards. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high prevalence of infection risk among hospitalised adults and confirms the multifactorial nature of infection risk in hospital settings. The RAC scale proved to be a useful tool for systematic risk stratification, with the three-level classification providing enhanced clinical applicability. Integrating structured infection risk assessment into routine care may support early identification of high-risk patients, enable targeted preventive interventions, and strengthen infection prevention and control programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.