ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
From mechanistic models to artificial intelligence: exploring the potential of digital twins in geriatric oncology.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This survey explores how machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) can be integrated with mechanistic models to create more accurate, dynamic, predictive, and personalized representations of biological systems, commonly referred to as digital twins (DTs). Mechanistic models, such as pathway-based Boolean or differential equation frameworks, provide interpretable insights into biological processes; however, calibrating these models to represent individual variability across large, heterogeneous cohorts remains a significant challenge, as their physically constrained structures often lack the flexibility to capture complex, non-mechanistic nuances in patient data. Focusing on elderly cancer patients-a vulnerable population underrepresented in clinical research-we discuss how hybrid DTs can bridge the gap between interpretable mechanistic frameworks and flexible, predictive AI approaches, enabling continuous monitoring, risk stratification, and adaptive treatment planning. To illustrate these principles, we present a proof-of-concept case study involving a synthetic breast cancer dataset in which comprehensive geriatric assessment, clinical tests, and quality of life measures inform dosing decisions for older patients via a Markov Decision Process. By combining a synthesis of current literature with the application of a sequential decision-making framework optimized using longitudinal data, this work provides a foundational understanding for researchers and clinicians interested in leveraging DTs to improve personalization and outcomes in geriatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.