Evidence mapPaperPMID 42565010Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1)-Based Therapies and Hematological Malignancies: A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Evidence.

Hari Krishnan Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hari Krishnan NairHematology and Medical Oncology, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker M.D. School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initially introduced for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/GLP-1 receptor agonists, have become integral to the management of both diabetes and obesity, with their therapeutic indications now extending to cardiovascular and renal diseases. As prescribing has surged, so too has interest in the oncologic implications of these agents. While the relationship between GLP-1-based therapies and solid tumors has been increasingly studied, their association with hematological malignancies, including leukemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), and plasma cell dyscrasias, has only recently attracted dedicated investigation. This narrative review synthesizes the current preclinical, epidemiological, and clinical evidence linking GLP-1-based therapies to hematological malignancy risk, incidence, and outcomes. Emerging data from large retrospective cohort studies, findings from randomized controlled trial (RCT) network meta-analyses and observational pharmacoepidemiologic studies conducted in real-world settings suggest a predominantly protective association, though agent-specific heterogeneity exists. Putative mechanisms, including immunomodulation, inhibition of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB)-mediated inflammatory signaling, modulation of the bone marrow microenvironment, and reduction of obesity-mediated hematopoietic dysregulation, are discussed. Limitations of the existing evidence base, safety considerations during active cancer therapy, and directions for future prospective investigation are also addressed.

Indexed as

glp-1 receptor agonisthematological malignancyimmunomodulationleukemialymphomamultiple myelomamyelodysplastic syndromesobesitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42565010
PMCPMC13445956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.