ArticleActa odontologica Scandinavica2026
Development of a nomogram to predict 5-year tooth loss after root canal treatment in patients with cracked teeth and chronic irreversible pulpitis.
Article in Acta odontologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the influencing factors of tooth retention within 5 years after root canal treatment (RCT) in patients with cracked teeth and chronic irreversible pulpitis, and to construct a nomogram model so as to provide a basis for the selection of clinical treatment regimen for such patients.
methodsThis retrospective case analysis included 295 patients (295 affected teeth) with cracked teeth complicated with chronic irreversible pulpitis who were treated from January 2017 to January 2020. Tooth retention within 5 years was taken as outcome event; independent-samples t test and chi-square test were applied for single factor comparison. Lasso was used to screen the variables. Binary logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the related factors. The nomogram model was constructed by the 'rms' package of R software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn to evaluate the discrimination degree of the model. Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) test was performed and the calibration curve was drawn to evaluate the calibration degree of the model. Decision curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the clinical practicability of the model.
resultsSuccessful and improved teeth were recorded as tooth survival. According to whether the teeth were retained within 5 years, the enrolled patients were categorized into survival group (265 cases) and non-survival group (30 cases), with the 5-year tooth survival rate of 89.9%. Multivariate analysis identified 2-3 RCT visits (Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] = 0.15 [0.05, 0.50]), probing depth > 5 mm (OR [95% CI] = 2.99 [1.26, 7.09]), and crown restoration (OR [95% CI] = 0.28 [0.09, 0.83]) as independent predictors of 5-year tooth loss (p < 0.05). The nomogram was constructed based on multivariate results and the area under the ROC curve of the prediction model was 0.73 (0.62,0.84). H-L test revealed p = 0.682, and the calibration curve of the model had a high overlap degree with the ideal curve. The risk threshold ranged from 4 to 68%. The nomogram model line was located at the upper right of the None line and the All line.
conclusionMultivariate analysis identified 2-3 RCT visits, probing depth > 5 mm, and crown restoration as independent predictors of 5-year tooth loss, and the nomogram constructed based on the above indicators has good practicability to predict tooth loss in patients. However, the sample size of our study was relatively limited, and the patient population was specific and may not be representative of the general population. Further external validation in a multi-center population is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.