ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Quality management and specifications of multidisciplinary Parkinson's disease management: an expert opinion.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease multidisciplinary complex therapy (PD-MCT) has emerged as an effective, standardized inpatient treatment approach in Germany that combines individualized pharmacological optimization with intensive, coordinated non-pharmacological interventions. This multimodal regimen has consistently been associated with improvements in both motor and non-motor symptoms, as well as patient-reported outcomes. Although its clinical benefits are increasingly recognized and a first randomized controlled trial is currently underway, a comprehensive appraisal of the structural framework underpinning PD-MCT delivery remains lacking. In this expert opinion, we aim to systematically summarize the current formal structural requirements defined by the German public reimbursement system as well as guidelines by relevant professional and societal networks. We outline key elements such as indication for treatment, coding criteria, minimum therapy intensities, and interdisciplinary team composition. Furthermore, we critically examine how these regulatory and organizational specifications translate into real-world care, including potential discrepancies between formal criteria and clinical practice. We assess the utility and role of PD-MCT within existing multidisciplinary and alternative treatment approaches in Germany and international settings. Finally, we discuss future directions to refine PD-MCT from a regulatory and health policy perspective, with the goal of enhancing accessibility, at-home preservation of treatment effects, and patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565841What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.