ArticleJournal of molecular histology2026
Stage-dependent expression and nuclear localization of EZH2 in endometrial carcinogenesis: evidence from cell lines and human tissues.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) is a key epigenetic regulator implicated in tumor progression; however, its expression pattern and subcellular localization across different stages of endometrial carcinogenesis remain incompletely characterized. This study evaluated EZH2 expression in two biologically distinct endometrial carcinoma cell lines (Ishikawa and MFE-319) and in archived human endometrial tissues representing proliferative and secretory endometrium, hyperplasia, and Type I and Type II endometrial carcinomas. Histopathological evaluation was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining. EZH2 expression was assessed by immunocytochemistry and Western blot analysis in the cell lines and by immunohistochemistry in tissue specimens, while apoptosis was evaluated by TUNEL assay in tissue samples. MFE-319 cells demonstrated significantly higher EZH2 expression than Ishikawa cells (H-score: 352.9 ± 78.9 vs. 137.6 ± 31.5, p < 0.0001), and Western blot analysis confirmed the same direction of change. Among tissue specimens, the highest EZH2 immunoreactivity was observed in Type II endometrial carcinoma (366.0 ± 63.7), with significantly higher expression than proliferative endometrium (231.5 ± 59.3), secretory endometrium (190.5 ± 52.4), and hyperplasia without atypia (261.0 ± 56.9), whereas no significant differences were detected among several intermediate histopathological groups. Nuclear localization of EZH2 became more prominent in atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma tissues. Apoptotic indices were significantly higher in both Type I and Type II carcinomas than in normal endometrium and hyperplasia groups, representing an association with increased EZH2 expression rather than evidence of a direct mechanistic relationship. These findings demonstrate that EZH2 expression differs across histopathological categories of endometrial lesions, with the highest expression observed in Type II endometrial carcinoma. The observed predominance of nuclear EZH2 in atypical hyperplasia and carcinoma further supports its association with aggressive tumor biology, although additional functional and clinicopathological studies are required to establish its clinical and biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42565851What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.