Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42565966›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2026

Where's the way out? Access block, boarding and hospital overcrowding: a narrative review.

Mario Corciulo, Fabrizio Giostra, Claudio Borghi, Davide Agnoletti

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mario CorciuloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy. mario.corciulo2@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9539-5587
Fabrizio GiostraEmergency Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-8295
Claudio BorghiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8039-8781
Davide AgnolettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Massarenti 9, 40138, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8108-7133

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a persistent global challenge associated with adverse patient outcomes and system inefficiencies. Boarding and access block, which delay the transfer of admitted patients to inpatient beds, represent its most critical manifestations. While overcrowding has traditionally been attributed to rising demand and ED inefficiencies, growing evidence identifies downstream constraints in hospital capacity and patient flow as major drivers. A non-systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed and Web of Science focusing on studies published between January 1990 and December 2025 related to ED overcrowding, boarding, hospital overcrowding, access block, patient flow, and hospital capacity. The literature was narratively synthesized and organized according to the input-throughput-output framework to examine system-level determinants and interventions and to explore overcrowding as a hospital-wide phenomenon. Interventions targeting input and throughput processes improve local ED performance metrics but often fail to reduce overcrowding when output capacity remains constrained. Conversely, high inpatient-bed occupancy, delayed discharge processes, and inefficient hospital-wide patient flow are frequently associated with access block and boarding. Overall, the literature supports the interpretation of ED overcrowding as a manifestation of hospital-wide dysfunction. High-performing hospitals prioritize patient flow as an institutional focus and adopt a system-level approach, characterized by executive leadership involvement, real-time data monitoring, and shared accountability across departments. Boarding may be better understood as the clinical manifestation of system-level failure in hospital patient flow rather than an ED-specific issue. The way out requires a shift from ED-centered interventions to coordinated, hospital-wide strategies, recognizing that the responsibility for timely and safe patient flow lies with the entire organization.

Indexed as

Access blockBoardingEmergency department overcrowdingHospital overcrowdingPatient flow

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.