Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42566052›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2026

Radiomics for risk stratification in brain metastases: potential in melanoma brain metastases.

Johanna Heugenhauser, Sabrina Herbst, Tamara Drucks, Christoph Scherfler, Tadeja Urbanic Purkart, Eva Maria Hassler, Richard Partl, Marlene Leoni, Kariem Mahdy Ali, Sarah Iglseder and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Johanna HeugenhauserDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabrina HerbstInstitute of Information Systems Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Tamara DrucksInstitute of Information Systems Engineering, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph ScherflerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Tadeja Urbanic PurkartDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Eva Maria HasslerDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Richard PartlDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Marlene LeoniDiagnostic & Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Kariem Mahdy AliDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Sarah IglsederDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christian FreyschlagDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stephanie MangesiusDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Astrid GramsDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Meinhard Nevinny-StickelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Martha NowosielskiDepartment of Neurology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. martha.nowosielski@i-med.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of quantitative non-invasive imaging biomarkers, including radiomics, may complement molecular characterization and thereby improve clinical management of neuro-oncological patients. We aimed to identify imaging predictors with improved performance over clinical parameters to stratify patients with brain metastases into high and low-risk groups for overall survival (OS). 422 patients recruited by two neuro-oncological centers were included with first diagnosis of brain metastases from different primary tumors. From each patient, 15 clinical parameters and a total of 321 radiomic features extracted from cerebral MRI were employed in prediction models to classify patients into low- and high-risk groups for OS. The best performing model was a bootstrap aggregating model including only clinical features (test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.72), while the combined and radiomic datasets led to poorer results (test set: macro F-1 = 0.60, accuracy = 0.67; test set: macro F-1 = 0.62, accuracy = 0.52, respectively). However, in the subgroup of melanoma patients (n = 54), the radiomic dataset showed better predictive power over clinical and combined dataset (test set: macro F-1 score = 0.71, accuracy = 0.77). 80% and 67% of melanoma patients were correctly classified into the low- and the high-risk group for OS, respectively. Clinical features remained the strongest predictors of risk across patients with brain metastases from different primary tumors. Although, in melanoma patients, radiomic features provided better prediction of the survival outcome compared to clinical parameters alone.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMelanomaRadiomicsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk AssessmentBrain metastasesMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsRisk score

Identifiers

PMID42566052
PMCPMC13451392

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.