ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2026
Antigen Pressure, Clonal Evolution, and Lineage Plasticity in B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Resistance Biology in the Immunotherapy Era.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTargeted immunotherapies have transformed the treatment of relapsed and refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet their efficacy depends on sustained expression of lineage-associated surface antigens. This review examines how antigen-directed pressure reshapes the biology of resistance, distinguishes canonical antigen escape from lineage plasticity, and clarifies the genomic contexts, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications of these distinct escape routes. RECENT
findingsUnder antigen-directed pressure, leukemia may escape through antigen downregulation, alternative splicing, acquired genetic alteration, or epitope disruption - mechanisms that generally preserve B-lineage identity and often remain addressable with alternative lineage-directed therapy. A biologically distinct route is lineage plasticity, in which cells destabilize lineage commitment or undergo overt lineage switch; clinical outcomes are poor, with a median overall survival of approximately 4.8 months in the largest reported series. Lineage switch is enriched within permissive genomic contexts, most notably KMT2A-rearranged leukemia, which accounted for the majority of B-ALL-to-acute myeloid leukemia or mixed-phenotype switches in a large international cohort. By contrast, CD19-negative antigen escape is more strongly associated with TP53 mutations and preserves B-lineage identity. Whether switching reflects selection of pre-existing subclones, active epigenetic reprogramming, or both remains unresolved. As antigen-directed therapies move into frontline use, distinguishing antigen escape from true lineage transformation is becoming essential for relapse surveillance, disease classification, therapeutic sequencing, and the design of strategies to prevent resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42566056What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.