ArticleFEMS yeast research2026
Replicative age differentially predicts metabolic competence across industrial yeasts at single-cell resolution.
Article in FEMS yeast research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In industrial yeast fermentations, population-level viability assays routinely report healthy cultures even as aged, metabolically compromised mother-cell subpopulations go undetected. Replicative age contributes to this hidden heterogeneity, but its link to a cell's metabolic competence has been difficult to measure simultaneously in the same cell by high-throughput flow cytometry. Here, we introduce a dual-parameter flow cytometry workflow combining bud-scar labeling with a recombinant His6-SUMO-mCherry-chitin-binding domain fusion protein (∼610 nm emission) and 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (CFDA)-based viability detection (∼525 nm), providing spectral orthogonality without computational autofluorescence correction. We applied it to four industrially relevant yeasts: Saccharomyces pastorianus W-34/70, S. cerevisiae var. diastaticus BE-134, S. cerevisiae var. chevalieri LA-01, and Komagataella phaffii X33. In S. pastorianus, viability declined monotonically from 88% in daughter cells to 5% in the oldest resolved mother-cell class; longitudinal monitoring over 96 h captured a progressive widening of the age-dependent viability gradient masked at the population level. Among S. cerevisiae variants, age-dependent gradients were weaker and strain-specific, while in K. phaffii reliable discrimination required exponential growth. Replicative age is thus a strain-dependent predictor of metabolic competence rather than a universally conserved one, and the workflow offers brewers and bioprocess developers a practical tool for age-resolved fermentation monitoring and pitching-yeast assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.